This paper aims at understanding how the subject-object dualism is present in judgments of the Courts.How to ensure the effectiveness of the Sports Accessories Code of Civil Procedure before the conscience of the magistrate and the paradigms highlighted here? Demonstrates that the philosophy of language influences how decisions are made in Court.So the objective is to address the thinking developed in classical metaphysics and modern.
In classical metaphysics the notion of the truth found in the things, ie, the objects, being a strong influence for the School of Exegesis arose in France and in the School of Jurisprudence of the concepts developed in Germany.The rupture occurred in modern metaphysics brings the philosophy of consciousness and the notion of subject formulated by Descartes.The subject becomes Hydration the subjugated of things, is that it is the truth, the prior knowledge.
His influence is clearly present in the School of Jurisprudence of Interests.The modern metaphysics was only surpassed in the field of philosophy, with the linguistic turn.The methodology used will be the hermeneutical method.